Monthly Archives: February 2024

Video of the Week: Shadow Lettering

Standard

Wordless Wednesday: My Twin Granddaughters

Standard
Robin & Etta

Writing Dialogue

Standard

Dialogue has several functions in fiction. It can advance the plot. It can provide backstory. It can reveal a character’s emotion or motivation. It can hint at a character’s ethnicity or integrity. And it can make or break your story.

One of the biggest controversies in the writing world is whether or not or how often to use dialogue tags. Some say to use only the tag “said,” and only as often as necessary to indicate who is talking. But I believe it’s often important to know how the character said his or her words. Did he whisper, shout, whine? Some authors don’t want to distract from the flow of the conversation with any kind of description of tone. (Or maybe they’re afraid of accidentally writing a croaker. Don’t know what that is? I didn’t either, until I read the second half of the linked article. Read the first half, too, about Tom Swifties [no relation to Taylor Swifties], which appeared in a popular early 20th century children’s adventure series featuring the character Tom Swift, and which we enjoyed emulating in high school in the late 1960s.)

To avoid using dialogue tags altogether, some writers intersperse “beats,” small actions by the characters, so we have an idea who the speaker is. (James cleared his throat. “I know where your wallet is.”) No matter how you handle dialogue tags, you have to make it clear who is speaking. If it’s a back-and-forth conversation between two people, you may be able to use fewer tags than if three or four people are chiming in.

Ideally, each of your characters should have a unique voice. (If so, you can use dialogue tags less frequently.) Nevertheless, dialogue should mimic natural speech patterns and rhythms. The best way to check for that is to read the dialogue out loud. If you trip over the words, they probably don’t fit natural speech patterns. (Although that might be totally okay if the character is socially awkward. Yes, you can use dialogue to develop your character’s character.)

Dialogue should reflect the dynamics of the relationships between the characters. For example, more formal language might be used when a new employee is speaking to her manager. Sharp, cold words are appropriate between feuding neighbors. Flirtatious phrases might be exchanged in a bar between patrons looking for a one-night stand.

Realistic dialogue shouldn’t state the obvious. Let there be subtext. Let there be emotion under the surface that your reader can interpret for himself. Here is another function for beats and descriptions. If the character avoids meeting his wife’s eyes, is he hiding something? If she says she’s fine, but she’s drumming her fingers on the tabletop, is she really seething?

And, please, don’t make the reader endure small talk. Get to the point. For the sake of pacing, cut unnecessary words and sentences in your dialogue, unless it’s important for the reader to know that the character has to comment on the weather and sports scores every time she meets someone.

Following these suggestions will help you write brilliant dialogue. Use it to set mood, provide vital information, move the plot forward or reveal character. If it is not adding to your story, rewrite it or cut it out.

Now it’s your turn. What’s your favorite tip for writing engaging dialogue? Do you know an author who excels at dialogue? (I love Janet Evanovich’s character Lula in the Stephanie Plum books. Talk about a distinctive voice! You see what I’m sayin’?) Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Monday Morning Wisdom #452

Standard

It is better to turn over a question without deciding it than to decide it without turning it over.

~ Joseph Joubert

From the Creator’s Heart #443

Standard

Fernando Botero at the Desert Botanical Garden

Standard
Fernando Botera
Botero Plaza, Medellín, Colombia; sculptures by Fernando Botera; image is in the public domain; found in Wikimedia Commons

In December, the handbell choir I belong to made its annual visit to the Desert Botanical Garden in Phoenix, Arizona. It just so happened it also coincided with an exhibit there of work by the Colombian painter and sculptor, Fernando Botero.

I had seen some of his work before. It’s very distinctive. Most of his figures are, shall we say, extremely chunky. But I knew nothing about the man. I took photos of some of the paintings (and I did not find out what the names of them are), and decided I’d eventually do a little research and write a post about Botero for ARHtistic License.

Fernando Botero was born in Medellín  April 19, 1932. His father, a salesman, died of a heart attack when Fernando was four. His mother supported the family by working as a seamstress. As a young child, Botero’s exposure to art was limited to the Baroque colonial churches of Medellín.

Fernando Botera
photo by ARHuelsenbeck

When he was a little older, he was awarded a scholarship to the Jesuit School of Bolívar. In 1944, his uncle sent him to a school for matadors for two years. In 1948, his first illustrations were published in the Sunday supplement of El Colombiano, one of the most important newspapers in Medellín. He was only 16 years old. He used the payment he received to attend high school at the Liceo de Marinilla de Antioquia.

Botero’s work was first exhibited in 1948, in a group show along with other artists from the region. From 1949 to 1950, Botero worked as a set designer, before moving to Bogotá in 1951, where he worked as a newspaper illustrator.

Fernando Botera
photo by ARHuelsenbeck

He saved his earnings until in 1952, he had enough money to sail to Europe. He disembarked in Barcelona and then moved on to Madrid, where he studied at the Academia de San Fernando. He frequently visited the Prado Museum, where he copied works by Goya and Velázquez.

In 1953, Botero moved to Paris, where he spent most of his time studying the artworks in the Louvre. He also lived in Florence from 1953 to 1954, exploring the works of Renaissance masters. Later in life, he lived most of the time in Paris, but spent one month a year in his native city of Medellín.

Fernando Botera
photo by ARHuelsenbeck

Around 1964, Botero began experimenting with sculpture. Due to the high cost of working with bronze, he made his sculptures with acrylic resin and sawdust. A notable example during this time was Small Head (Bishop) in 1964, a sculpture painted with great realism. But the material was too porous, so he abandoned this method. He returned to sculpture in Italy in the mid-1970s and exhibited his characteristic bronze sculptures for the first time at the Grand Palais in Paris in 1977.

On June 10, 1995, while his son Fernando Botero Zea was serving as Minister of Defense, a bomb was placed underneath one of Botero’s bronze sculptures on display in Medellín’s Plaza San Antonio. The resulting explosion killed 23 people and injured 200 more; the perpetrators were never identified. A horrified Botero decided that the damaged sculpture should be left in place as a “monument to the country’s imbecility and criminality” and donated an intact replica to stand alongside it.

Fernando Botera
photo by ARHuelsenbeck

In 2004, Botero exhibited a series of 27 drawings and 23 paintings dealing with the violence in Colombia from 1999 through 2004. He donated the works to the National Museum of Colombia, where they were first exhibited.

In 2005, Botero gained considerable attention for his Abu Ghraib series, which was exhibited first in Europe. He based the works on allegations of United States forces’ abuses of prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison during the Iraq War. Botero produced more than 85 paintings and 100 drawings in exploring this concept and “painting out the poison”. The series was exhibited at two United States locations in 2007, including Washington, DC. Botero said he would not sell any of the works, but would donate them to museums. In 2009, the Berkeley Art Museum acquired (as a gift from the artist) 56 paintings and drawings from the Abu Ghraib series, which can be seen online. Selections from the series have been regularly included in the museum’s annual Art for Human Rights exhibitions.

Fernando Botera
photo by ARHuelsenbeck

In 2006, after having focused exclusively on the Abu Ghraib series for over 14 months, Botero returned to the themes of his early life such as the family and motherhood.

In 2008, he exhibited the works of his The Circus collection, featuring 20 works in oil and watercolor. While his work includes still lifes and landscapes, Botero concentrated on his portraiture. His paintings and sculptures are characterized by their proportionally exaggerated figures.

Man on Horse by Fernando Botera; photo in public domain; found on Wikimedia Commons

Though he spent only one month a year in Colombia, he considered himself the “most Colombian artist living.” World-wide, he is certainly the best-known Colombian artist.

Botero died from complications of pneumonia at age 91, in Monaco, on September 15, 2023, just weeks before the opening of his exhibit at the Desert Botanical Garden.

Information for this article came from Wikipedia. Read more about Botero and the exhibit at the Desert Botanical Garden. And if you will be in the greater Phoenix area, the exhibit continues until March 31, 2024.

Creative Juice #384

Standard
Creative Juice #384

Good news, artsy people! Lots of good articles here. . .

Video of the Week: Village Watercolor Tutorial

Standard

Wordless Wednesday: Guinea Pigs?

Standard

Review of Hearing God Through Biblical Meditation by Mark Virkler

Standard

Don’t you long to hear God’s voice? I know I have heard it on occasion. But I can’t summon it at will. I eagerly read this book in 2021, but didn’t review it then. I read half of it again yesterday to refresh my memory. Again, I started it eagerly.

Hearing God Through Biblical Meditation starts out with wonderful suggestions. Stillness. Seeing Jesus with the eyes of one’s heart. Knowing that Jesus is always with you. “God’s voice in your heart often sounds like a flow of spontaneous thoughts.”

Virkler identifies four keys to successful meditation: Quiet down, tune to spontaneity, look for vision, and journal.

Each chapter ends with exercises, which I confess I thought about briefly, but didn’t do.

And then I got bogged down.

With virtually every chapter, Virkler gives us new points to internalize. Five ways to tell whether you’re hearing God’s voice. Four pillars of meditation. Seven steps to receive revelation knowledge through meditation. (When asking for revelation, “you are asking the Holy Spirit to unveil that which is under the surface. . .you are asking Him to shine light on what that passage means and how it can be applied.”) Twelve points to properly handling scripture. Fourteen basic principles for interpreting scripture. Four disciplines of inductive Bible study. Seven (actually way more than seven) questions about what is going on in the passage of Scripture. I can’t keep that many points in mind at one time. His process becomes cumbersome for me.

I wish Virkler would go back and rewrite this book, simplifying it, concentrating on the four keys, discussing them in detail, and including some of the rest of the material in the context of illuminating the keys. In other words, not telling us everything there is to know on the subject of Biblical meditation, but just giving us practical suggestions to facilitate hearing God’s voice.

Since Virkler doesn’t rewrite his work according to my whims, my suggestion for someone who wants to read this book is—take the journaling idea very seriously. Buy a notebook. Read this book slowly, like maybe a chapter a week. Do the exercises. Do your daily Bible reading and apply the points in the current chapter. See which points are helpful to you in your meditation, and make note of them in your notebook. When you’re all through reading this book, come up with your own points to deepening your meditation process. You can make this book work for you.